All Penetration, No Foreplay: Emerald Fennell’s “Wuthering Heights”

Artwork by Tijana Moraca (2023) A set of double marks, signed with hands raised and fingers twitching; “Wuthering Heights”, spoken with derision. This is how I’ve been introducing Emerald Fennell’s latest film to friends.  My use of air quotes is not only a poor attempt at physical comedy but a direct riff on Fennell’s own…

I can help you get your content back! This sounds like it could be a theme issue or a display problem rather than your content actually being deleted. First, let’s check if your content is still there – go to your dashboard and click on “Pages” to see if your pages are still listed there. Are you seeing your pages in the dashboard, or are they completely missing?

Got it! So your posts are still in your dashboard but the content isn’t showing when you view the individual articles on your site. Let’s check one thing – when you go to Posts in your dashboard and click “Edit” on one of your articles, can you see all the content there in the editor? This will help me figure out if it’s a display issue or something else.

Perfect! So your content is safe in the editor – this is likely a template issue where the Content block got removed from your post template. Go to Appearance → Editor → Templates and look for “Single Post” or “Post” template. Click on it and check if there’s a Content block in the template. If it’s missing, that’s why your article content isn’t displaying on the live site. Do you see the Content block in your post template?

From your WordPress.com dashboard, look for “Appearance” in the left sidebar menu – it should be listed along with other options like Posts, Pages, and Media. If you don’t see it there, you might be in wp-admin instead. Try going to thecamerapublication.com/wp-admin and look for “Appearance” in that left menu. Can you find it now?

Great! To confirm it’s a Content block, click on the block and look at the block toolbar that appears above it. You should see “Content” as the block name, or in the right sidebar it will say “Content” at the top of the block settings. The Content block usually shows placeholder text like “This is the Post Content block, it will display all the blocks in any single post or page” when you’re editing the template. Does that match what you’re seeing?

Perfect! So you do have the Content block in your template. Since your content shows in the editor but not on the live site, this might be a caching issue or the changes haven’t been saved properly. Try clicking the “Save” button in the top-right corner of the template editor, then visit one of your articles on the live site to see if the content appears now. Does that fix it?

Howdy The Camera 

I’m your personal AI assistant. I can help with any questions about your site or account.

All of our published text on the website has disappeared from our pages. How do we get it back?

I can help you get your content back! This sounds like it could be a theme issue or a display problem rather than your content actually being deleted.

First, let’s check if your content is still there – go to your dashboard and click on “Pages” to see if your pages are still listed there. Are you seeing your pages in the dashboard, or are they completely missing?

MoreSources

↗

They’re all still there – also, I meant to say from individual articles rather than pages.

Got it! So your posts are still in your dashboard but the content isn’t showing when you view the individual articles on your site.

Let’s check one thing – when you go to Posts in your dashboard and click “Edit” on one of your articles, can you see all the content there in the editor? This will help me figure out if it’s a display issue or something else.

MoreSources

↗

yes

Perfect! So your content is safe in the editor – this is likely a template issue where the Content block got removed from your post template.

Go to Appearance → Editor → Templates and look for “Single Post” or “Post” template. Click on it and check if there’s a Content block in the template. If it’s missing, that’s why your article content isn’t displaying on the live site.

Do you see the Content block in your post template?

MoreSources

↗

How do I go to Appearance?

From your WordPress.com dashboard, look for “Appearance” in the left sidebar menu – it should be listed along with other options like Posts, Pages, and Media.

If you don’t see it there, you might be in wp-admin instead. Try going to thecamerapublication.com/wp-admin and look for “Appearance” in that left menu. Can you find it now?

MoreSources

↗

I thinl there are content blocks… how do I know for sure?

Great! To confirm it’s a Content block, click on the block and look at the block toolbar that appears above it. You should see “Content” as the block name, or in the right sidebar it will say “Content” at the top of the block settings.

The Content block usually shows placeholder text like “This is the Post Content block, it will display all the blocks in any single post or page” when you’re editing the template. Does that match what you’re seeing?

More

Artwork by Tijana Moraca (2023)

A set of double marks, signed with hands raised and fingers twitching; “Wuthering Heights”, spoken with derision. This is how I’ve been introducing Emerald Fennell’s latest film to friends. 

My use of air quotes is not only a poor attempt at physical comedy but a direct riff on Fennell’s own approach to filmmaking, encapsulated by her view that “any adaptation of a novel, especially a novel like this, should have quotation marks around it.” Millennial in gesture and millennial in production, “Wuthering Heights” provokes the question –  protective grammar or not – at what point does an adaptation stop being worthy of its source material? When must it be judged as something else entirely? What stupefying heights must we, the audience, endure and how far must we be allowed to fall before we begin to ask where the hell it is that we are? 

With the film opening on a botched public hanging, we are dropped into a cruel world where spectacle prevails. Amongst a leering crowd, we join a young Catherine Earnshaw (Charlotte Mellington) and Nelly Dean (Vy Nguyen) who marvel as a condemned man enters a state of asphyxiation-induced priapism. The rigor erectus (death erection) sets the stage for what is to follow: a suffocating, pornographic collage of era- and plot-defying fanfiction that runs roughshod over the 19th-Century novel and its characters. 

In Fennell’s “Wuthering Heights, generations of Earnshaws are conflated in a single, alcoholic father flattening character complexity and confusing Heathcliff’s (Jacob Elordi) motivations; the two POC characters – an older Nelly Dean (Hong Chau) and Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif) – act as antagonists to the central romance, while a whitewashed Heathcliff lusts for the audience’s adoration; Isabella Linton (Alison Oliver) is made a masochist, shoddily subverting the abuse that makes the novel so harrowing; and we are denied the child that binds the plot to its inevitable, repetitive horror. In short, everything that could be done to undermine the original text – to cheapen and plunder it – is done. What remains? A sloppy montage of pretty though vapid scenes that would more appropriately be found in the draft folder of a TikToker’s CapCut than any serious cutting room. 

Going in, I trusted in Fennell’s vision of a Saltburn-style excess; I was willing to stand in defence of her baroque horniness. So what if the film wasn’t faithful to the period? Who cares if a few bathtubs were drained, or a grave or two fucked? Surely, I thought, these concerns would fade away in the gorgeous richness of Fennell’s excess and, under the swathes of organza and latex, we would find beating the bloody heart of Brontë’s novel. 

At moments, I could feel it weakly pulsing through: Catherine Earnshaw (Margot Robbie) billowing across the moors towards her doomed marriage; the naïve dreams of domesticity materialising in Isabella’s dollhouse; Heathcliff’s tailored, and admittedly sexy, apparition appearing through the mist. Ultimately, though, diaphanous desire quickly gave way to ichorous lust: dough slopped and massaged, carcasses trimmed, eggs fingered, entrails spilled. Hems of dresses became mired in blood and pyramids of glass were erected as crude monuments to vice. Teetering on the edge of camp, the imagery constantly stumbled into the gaudy and absurd. Fennell’s golden touch in Saltburn turned putrefying, as if all creative direction had curdled in the dank, moor air.

Yet, in the 10 days following its opening the film has made over $150 million worldwide. Across TikTok and Instagram, clips of people weeping at the film’s close have spread like wildfire – or plague. Opinion seems divided: The Independent gave the film a miserly 1-star, while The Telegraph awarded it a somewhat shocking 5-stars. What, then, is happening? The film’s popularity is also the thing that undoes it: the oblique appeal to spectacle may allow for multiple climaxes, emotional or otherwise, but leaves the viewer bereft of connection. It is all penetration and no foreplay. 

If Fennell’s “Wuthering Heights” is the “greatest love story of all time” – one that the producers told via supplication to TikTok marketers and the terminally online – then I find myself summoning an equally online prayer: may this love never find me.

By Troy Fielder